Course Features:

• Ask Questions! Our instructors monitor StudyDesk to answer your questions. StudyDesk also records the step where you make a mistake or ask a question. This is just one of many powerful educational tools in StudyDesk.

• Highly Interactive: You can search the course for any topic, take notes, view solutions, view reports, and each time you return to the course it presents the last topic you were studying.

• Versatile: You can access the course from any computer at any time.

• Statistics: Your performance on the exercises and tests is saved and you may review your performance and check solutions at any time. You can also check your ranking based on all students taking the course.

• Free Book! Includes a copy of the Master The LSAT book shipped to your home. (The course does not require the book.)

• Guarantee: If, at the end of the course, you do not feel sufficiently prepared for the test, you may repeat the course for free -- with full access to our instructors.

Click the links immediately below to view the other diagnostic tests.

CONTRAPOSITIVE RULE OF LOGIC

While no training in formal logic is required for the LSAT, essentially it is a logic test. So some knowledge of formal logic will give you a definite advantage.

To begin, consider the seemingly innocuous connective "if..., then...." Its meaning has perplexed both the philosopher and the layman through the ages. The statement "if A, then B" means by definition "if A is true, then B must be true as well," and nothing more. For example, we know from experience that if it is raining, then it is cloudy. So if we see rain falling past the window, we can validly conclude that it is cloudy outside.

There are three statements that can be derived from the implication "if A, then B"; two are invalid, and one is valid.

From "if A, then B" you cannot conclude "if B, then A." For example, if it is cloudy, you cannot conclude that it is raining. From experience, this example is obviously true; it seems silly that anyone could commit such an error. However, when the implication is unfamiliar to us, this fallacy can be tempting.

Another, and not as obvious, fallacy derived from "if A, then B" is to conclude "if not A, then not B." Again, consider the weather example. If it is not raining, you cannot conclude that it is not cloudy--it may still be overcast. This fallacy is popular with students.

Finally, there is one statement that is logically equivalent to "if A, then B." Namely, "if not B, then not A." This is called the contrapositive, and it is very important.

If there is a key to performing well on the LSAT, it is the contrapositive.

To show the contrapositive's validity, we once again appeal to our weather example. If it is not cloudy, then from experience we know that it cannot possibly be raining.

We now know two things about the implication "if A, then B":

1) If A is true, then B must be true.
2) If B is false, then A must be false.